Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Radeon Xpress X200
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 17285%
Hitman 3 29900% 22515%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 15800%
The Medium 28676% 21592%
Resident Evil 8 22961% 17285%
FIFA 21 11533% 8669%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 15285%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 24362%
Genshin Impact 22961% 17285%
Far Cry 6 33267% 25054%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress X200 are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The Radeon Xpress X200 was released less than a year after the GeForce 6150 LE, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6150 LE and the Radeon Xpress X200 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon Xpress X200 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6150 LE, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon Xpress X200 is marginally better than the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both the GeForce 6150 LE and the Radeon Xpress X200 have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and by the Radeon Xpress X200 is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs300 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51RS480
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs01 Nov 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed-vs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Radeon Xpress X200 is a very old GPU part of the Radeon Xpress Series released by ATI, now known as AMD, between 2004 and 2005.
It's an integrated GPU that uses up to 128MB of DDR, clocked at either 200MHz or 400MHz, system memory.
Its performance is horrible, even for today's forgiving games.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-