Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Riva TNT2 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 21737% 27336%
Halo: Reach 6839% 8618%
Cyberpunk 2077 29900% 37592%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21737% 27336%
Doom Eternal 18676% 23490%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 29900% 37592%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 741% 956%
Grand Theft Auto VI 33267% 41823%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 29900% 37592%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 13369% 16823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE are noticeably better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The GeForce 6150 LE was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the GeForce 6150 LE is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 32 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the GeForce 6150 LE and the Riva TNT2 Pro have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and by the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51NV5
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs32 MB
Memory Speed-vs166 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs6.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL2.1vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body