Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition Radeon R7 260
Red Dead Redemption 2 160% 224%
Cyberpunk 2077 257% 345%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 60% 100%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 257% 345%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 160% 224%
Doom Eternal 123% 179%
FIFA 20 38% 73%
Grand Theft Auto VI 297% 395%
Need For Speed Heat 160% 224%
Halo: Reach 17% 3%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 260.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 72 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 260, but the Radeon R7 260 has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the Radeon R7 260 exhibits a 5.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 72 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 260 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 Ti providing 1.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released less than a year after the Radeon R7 260, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 260 has 9.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is marginally better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260 has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 994 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653. The GTX 750 Ti having 341 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 Ti delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R7 260.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition requires 150 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260. The GTX 750 Ti requires 55 Watts more than the Radeon R7 260 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 750 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R7 260.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1072 MHzvs1000 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-400-A2GCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date18 Feb 2014vs17 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
9.7
1600x900
8.2
green tick vs
7.5
1920x1080
6.4
green tick vs
5.7
2560x1440
4.6
green tick vs
4
3840x2160
2.8
green tick vs
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs768
Actual Shader Performance48%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs48
Texture Rate42.9 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate17.2 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 20 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 Ti benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1072MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1150MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is only around 3% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and thus Radeon HD 7850 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Edition are still faster.
Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body