Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics P3000 Radeon HD 4250
Red Dead Redemption 2 2731% 4512%
Doom Eternal 2334% 3866%
Cyberpunk 2077 3789% 6236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2731% 4512%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1646% 2745%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3789% 6236%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 3789% 6236%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4225% 6947%
Need For Speed Heat 2731% 4512%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 9% 78%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics P3000 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 4250.

The HD Graphics P3000 has a 290 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 4250, but the Radeon HD 4250 has 3 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD Graphics P3000. As a result, the Radeon HD 4250 exhibits a 1.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD Graphics P3000. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD Graphics P3000 has a 290 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 4250, but the Radeon HD 4250 has 3 more Render Output Units than the HD Graphics P3000. As a result, the Radeon HD 4250 exhibits a 1.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD Graphics P3000. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD Graphics P3000 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD 4250, and so the HD Graphics P3000 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD 4250.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 512 MB video memory, but the HD Graphics P3000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD Graphics P3000 has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 4250 has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the HD Graphics P3000 is 32 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15. The HD Graphics P3000 having 17 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD Graphics P3000 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 4250.

The HD Graphics P3000 transistor size technology is 23 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 4250. This means that the HD Graphics P3000 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 4250. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD Graphics P3000 should consume less power than the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs560 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureSandy BridgeRS880
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2011vs30 Mar 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory Speed667 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs32 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units12vs40
Actual Shader Performance2%vs1%
Texture Mapping Units1vs4
Texture Rate0.9 GTexel/svs2.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units1vs4
Pixel Rate0.9 GPixel/svs2.2 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model4.0vs4.1
Open GL3.1vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel HD Graphics P3000 is an integrated GFX on some of Intel's Xeon Server CPUs.
Based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, it features 12 Shader Processing Units, supports openGL up to 3.1, Shader up to 4.0 and DirectX 10.1. Just like other integrated GPUs, it uses system memory and the max memory supported is DDR3-1333, meaning the max memory speed is 667MHz. The CPUs only support up to dual-channel memory, meaning a 128 bits bus is the largest bus width supported. It comes clocked at 850MHz but the Turbo Boost of the CPU can set it up to 1350MHz.
The performance depends on the CPU its embedded and on the type of system ram installed but overall is on level with NVIDIA'S old entry level GPUs.
Radeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants