Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1549% 1954%
Doom Eternal 1318% 1666%
Cyberpunk 2077 2165% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1549% 1954%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 917% 1167%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2165% 2721%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 2165% 2721%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2419% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 1549% 1954%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 37% 21%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile are noticeably better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M.

The Graphics 4200 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Graphics 4200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 4200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics 4200 has 20 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics 4200 transistor size technology is 58 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Graphics 4200 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics 4200 should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The HD Graphics 4200 Mobile requires 20 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 30 Watts more than the Graphics 4200 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 1600M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Graphics 4200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock850 MHzvs-
ArchitectureHaswellG84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jul 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units20vs-
Actual Shader Performance4%vs-
Technology22nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate0.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile are integrated graphics in the ULV Haswell Mobile processors.
Their performance depends on the processor they are integrated on, as the latter defines the Base and Boost Clock, as well as on the SYSTEM RAM, which defines the operating memory clock, and whether the GPU accesses a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface.
Best case scenario, the Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile perform slightly above Intel HD 4000 Graphics, though some variants actually perform worse and so most modern demanding games will have to be played with the lowest settings, while a few aren't even playable.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body