Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 250X Asus 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM)
Cyberpunk 2077 444% 126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 296% 65%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 144% 2%
Halo: Reach 26% 48%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 444% 126%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 296% 65%
FIFA 20 111% 12%
Doom Eternal 241% 42%
Grand Theft Auto VI 506% 152%
Need For Speed Heat 296% 65%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 250X Asus 1GB Edition.

The R7 250X has a 85 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760 Ti, but the GTX 760 Ti has 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 760 Ti exhibits a 62.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 250X has a 85 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760 Ti, but the GTX 760 Ti has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 250X. As a result, the GTX 760 Ti exhibits a 13.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 250X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 250X was released less than a year after the GTX 760 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 760 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the R7 250X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 760 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 760 Ti has 120.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 760 Ti is massively better than the R7 250X.

The Radeon R7 250X Asus 1GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) has 1344. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 250X is 544 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 760 Ti is 1317. The GTX 760 Ti having 773 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 760 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 250X.

The Radeon R7 250X Asus 1GB Edition requires 80 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) requires 170 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 250X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 760 Ti. The GTX 760 Ti requires 90 Watts more than the R7 250X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 760 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 250X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs915 MHz
Boost Clock-vs980 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Cape Verde XTKepler GK104-325-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date13 Feb 2014vs17 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
10
1600x900
6.8
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
5.2
vs green tick
8.1
2560x1440
3.5
vs green tick
5.9
3840x2160
2.3
vs green tick
4.3

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1125 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth72GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs1344
Actual Shader Performance26%vs63%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs112
Texture Rate40 GTexel/svs102.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs29.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power80 Wattsvs170 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 20 Ampsvs500 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R7 250X Asus 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class Radeon R7 250X.
This edition comes with a custom cooling solution which will make the card even cooler and overclocked out of the box in the central unit which was increased from 950MHz to 1000MHz, while the operating memory clock was left untouched.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is exactly like Radeon HD 7770.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) is an OEM only high-end Graphics Card based on the Kepler GK104 (325-A2 Variant) core of the Kepler Architecture.
The 325-A2 Variant of the Kepler GK104 Core offers 1344 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface. While the central unit runs at 915MHz and goes up to 980MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz.
It's therefore a renamed GeForce GTX 670 and will offer exactly the same performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body