Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8370D HD i5 660
Cyberpunk 2077 3392% 4224%
Call of Duty Warzone 2442% 3047%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3784% 4709%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3392% 4224%
Minecraft: Dungeons 2584% 3224%
Maneater 2085% 2606%
Valorant 149% 209%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 1389% 1744%
Doom Eternal 2489% 3106%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 2347% 2929%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8370D are noticeably better than the Intel HD i5 660.

The Radeon HD 8370D was released over three years more recently than the HD i5 660, and so the Radeon HD 8370D is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD i5 660 when running the latest games.

Neither the Radeon HD 8370D nor the HD i5 660 have an entry for video memory, so the two GPUs cannot be compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8370D has 128 Shader Processing Units but the HD i5 660 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8370D requires 65 Watts to run and the HD i5 660 requires 73 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon HD 8370D. The HD i5 660 requires 8 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8370D to run. The difference is not significant enough for the HD i5 660 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 8370D.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed760 MHzvs733 MHz
Boost Clock844 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Thames PROClarkdale
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date18 Sep 2013vs30 Mar 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory Speed1067 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs10.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs-
Actual Shader Performance3%vs-
Texture Mapping Units24vs-
Texture Rate18.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate6.1 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Wattsvs73 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts-

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8370D is an embedded Graphics Card on the low end Richland APUs like the A4-6300, A4-6320
They offer 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The memory interface depends on whether or not the system's RAM is dual channelled.
While the central unit runs at 760MHz, since the GFX doesn't have dedicated memory, the bandwidth will depend on the system ram speed which can be up to 2133MHz (the max speed supported by the CPU). Therefore, the max boost clock is 844MHz.
Th graphical performance is not top end by todays integrated graphics standards
Intel HD i5 660 is a specific version of Intel GMA graphics that is built into Intel Core i5 660 processor. This can handle most of the latest games like, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, Batman: Arkham City, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim on the lowest settings in a pretty good frame rate. Perfect fit for a non-hardcore gamer.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants