Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8370D FireGL V3400
Cyberpunk 2077 3392% 4088%
Call of Duty Warzone 2442% 2948%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3784% 4558%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3392% 4088%
Maneater 2085% 2521%
Valorant 149% 199%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 1389% 1686%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 2347% 2834%
Doom Eternal 2489% 3005%
Mafia 2: Definitive Edition 2228% 2692%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8370D are noticeably better than the AMD FireGL V3400.

The Radeon HD 8370D was released over three years more recently than the FireGL V3400, and so the Radeon HD 8370D is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the FireGL V3400 when running the latest games.

The FireGL V3400 has 128 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8370D does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8370D has 128 Shader Processing Units and the FireGL V3400 has 5. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 8370D is 54 and the actual shader performance of the FireGL V3400 is 2. The Radeon HD 8370D having 52 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD 8370D delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FireGL V3400.

The Radeon HD 8370D requires 65 Watts to run but there is no entry for the FireGL V3400. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon HD 8370D and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the FireGL V3400. The Radeon HD 8370D has been recommended a PSU with 150 Watts more than the FireGL V3400. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon HD 8370D may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the FireGL V3400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed760 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock844 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Thames PRO-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date18 Sep 2013vs14 Aug 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs16GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs5
Actual Shader Performance3%vs0%
Technology40nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units24vs-
Texture Rate18.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate6.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs2
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power65 Watts-
Recommended PSU450 Wattsvs300 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs9.0c
Shader Model5.0vs3.0
Open GL4.3vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8370D is an embedded Graphics Card on the low end Richland APUs like the A4-6300, A4-6320
They offer 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The memory interface depends on whether or not the system's RAM is dual channelled.
While the central unit runs at 760MHz, since the GFX doesn't have dedicated memory, the bandwidth will depend on the system ram speed which can be up to 2133MHz (the max speed supported by the CPU). Therefore, the max boost clock is 844MHz.
Th graphical performance is not top end by todays integrated graphics standards
The ATI FireGL range of video cards, renamed to FirePro 3D in late 2008, is the series specifically for CAD (Computer Aided Design) and DCC (Digital Content Creation) software, usually found in workstations. The FireGL line is designed for multimedia content creation programs, such as 3DS Max, and mechanical engineering design software such as Solidworks, whereas Radeon counterparts are suited towards video games. FireGL drivers were built with maximum image quality and pixel precision, with CAD specific functionalities such as the recently introduced AutoDetection Technology to tune the parameters inside the driver to achieve maximum performance for predefined list of software. However, because the drivers are also based on the Catalyst drivers made for the Radeon line, it makes them suitable for gaming, at the expense of probable compatibility issues with the very latest games due to the age of the drivers, with FireGL cards in theory pushing more data than their Radeon gaming counterparts.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-