Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire | GeForce GTX 1080 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5% | 30% |
Hitman 3 | 36% | 9% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 4% | 36% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7% | 38% |
FIFA 21 | 47% | 65% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 47% | 2% |
Far Cry 6 | 52% | 1% |
Genshin Impact | 5% | 30% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 50% | 0% |
Battlefield 6 | 36% | 9% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 280X Crossfire.
The GeForce GTX 1080 has a 757 MHz higher core clock speed but 96 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the R9 280X. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GeForce GTX 1080 manages to provide 39.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GeForce GTX 1080 has a 757 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 280X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce GTX 1080 providing 48.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce GTX 1080 was released over a year more recently than the R9 280X, and so the GeForce GTX 1080 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R9 280X.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GeForce GTX 1080 has 2048 MB more video memory than the R9 280X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the R9 280X has superior memory performance.
The R9 280X has 255.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 1080, which means that the memory performance of the R9 280X is massively better than the GeForce GTX 1080.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1080 has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 1080 is 5989. The GeForce GTX 1080 having 1893 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 280X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The GeForce GTX 1080 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 280X. This means that the GeForce GTX 1080 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 280X.
The Radeon R9 280X Crossfire requires 550 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 1080 requires 180 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 1000 Watts for the R9 280X and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GeForce GTX 1080. The R9 280X requires 370 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 1080 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 280X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 1080.
Core Speed | 850 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1607 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1733 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Tahiti XTL (x2) | Pascal P104-400-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 01 Oct 2013 | vs | ![]() | 27 May 2016 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.5
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
7.4
|
Memory | 6144 MB | vs | ![]() | 8192 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1500 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1251 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 768 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5X |
Memory Bandwidth | 576GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 320.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1536 KB | vs | ![]() |
2048 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | yes | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4096 | ![]() | vs | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | vs | ![]() | 16nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 256 | ![]() | vs | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 217.6 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 257.1 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 54.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 102.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | vs | ![]() | 7680x4320 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | ![]() | 3 | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 550 Watts | vs | ![]() | 180 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 1000 Watts & 42 Amps | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts & 33 Amps |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K 4-Core 4.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | 16 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon R9 280X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 280X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 280X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 60% better than a single Radeon R9 280X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 280X. Expect this combination to draw up to 550 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. | Overview GeForce GTX 1080 is a High-End Graphics Card based on the Pascal Architecture. Architecture It equips a GPU Codenamed P104-400-A1 which is a First Gen Pascal GPU and has 20 SM activated, offering 2560 Shader Processing Units, 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs. GPU The central unit runs at 1607MHz and goes up to 1733MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 8GB frame buffer of Second Gen GDDR5X, through a 256-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1251MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 180W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 8-pin connector. Performance Benchmarks Indicate GeForce GTX 1080 can be over 25% Faster than GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K. In Fact, even the Dual Radeon R9 295X2 is easily topped. At 1920x1080, the default rank for all GD Graphics Card, expect a performance boost ranging between 20% and 30%, over GeForce GTX 980 Ti. As of May 2016, GeForce GTX 1080 is the fastest single Graphics Card available. System Suggestions GeForce GTX 1080 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1600. We recommend a High-End Processor and 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |