Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 83% 91%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 67% 74%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 62% 69%
FIFA 21 8% 4%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 62% 69%
Watch Dogs Legion 76% 84%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 162% 173%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 73% 80%
Grand Theft Auto VI 157% 168%
Genshin Impact 83% 91%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition.

The R9 270X has a 94 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760, but the GTX 760 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 270X. As a result, the GTX 760 exhibits a 8.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 270X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 270X has a 94 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 760 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R9 270X providing 3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 270X was released less than a year after the GTX 760, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition and the Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 760 has 0.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 270X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 760 is marginally better than the R9 270X.

The GeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition has 1152 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition has 1280. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 760 is 1235 and the actual shader performance of the R9 270X is 1251. The R9 270X having 16 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 760 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition requires 170 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition requires 180 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 760 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R9 270X. The R9 270X requires 10 Watts more than the GTX 760 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 270X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 760.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1006 MHzvs1100 MHz
Boost Clock1072 MHzvs1150 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK104-225-A2GCN 1.1 Curacao XT
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date25 Sep 2013vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
9.9
green tick vs
9.6
1920x1080
7.9
green tick vs
7.7
2560x1440
5.7
green tick vs green tick
5.7
3840x2160
4.1
green tick vs green tick
4.1

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1502 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192.3GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1152vs1280
Actual Shader Performance59%vs60%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units96vs80
Texture Rate96.6 GTexel/svs88 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate32.2 GPixel/svs35.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power170 Wattsvs180 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 30 Ampsvs500 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 760 Asus DC Mini Edition is a special edition of GeForce GTX 760.
This edition comes with a custom dual-fan cooling solution which by itself should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 760 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology and has a much smaller PCB, useful for smaller cases.
Also, it has been overclocked out of the box from 980MHz to 1006MHz while its boost clock is now of 1072MHz. The memory clock was left untouched.
Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance boost when compared to the reference card and so this edition still performs worse than GeForce GTX 670.
Radeon R9 270X Sapphire Toxic 2GB OC Edition is a special edition of the high-end Radeon R9 270X.
This edition comes with a custom cooling system called "Tri-X", which reduces the card's temperature under load, significantly and comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was increased from 1000MHz to 1100MHz, while the Boost clock is now of 1150MHz. Also, the operating memory clock is now of 1500MHz.
Benchmarks indicate a 5% performance boost over the standard edition and so this card will surpass a Radeon HD 7950.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-