Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8350G GeForce 320M
Halo: Reach 646% 656%
Cyberpunk 2077 3124% 3167%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1347% 1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2246% 2278%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2246% 2278%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3124% 3167%
Doom Eternal 1918% 1944%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3486% 3533%
FIFA 20 1150% 1167%
Need For Speed Heat 2246% 2278%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8350G are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 8350G has a 64 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 8350G. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 3.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon HD 8350G. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 8350G has a 64 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 4 more Render Output Units than the Radeon HD 8350G. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 1.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon HD 8350G. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 8350G was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 320M, and so the Radeon HD 8350G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 8350G and the GeForce 320M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon HD 8350G has 4.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 320M, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon HD 8350G is marginally better than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 8350G has 128 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 8350G is 60 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The Radeon HD 8350G having 15 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD 8350G delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 8350G transistor size technology is 8 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 320M. This means that the Radeon HD 8350G is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 320M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 8350G should consume less power than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD 8350G requires 35 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The Radeon HD 8350G requires 12 Watts more than the GeForce 320M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon HD 8350G to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 320M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed514 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock720 MHzvs-
ArchitectureScrapperTesla MCP89
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date12 Mar 2013vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.4
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.7
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.1

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs48
Actual Shader Performance3%vs2%
Technology32nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs16
Texture Rate4.1 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs8
Pixel Rate2.1 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power35 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini Reviewto be added.Overview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body