Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8210 Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 2823% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 3916% 2721%
Doom Eternal 2414% 1666%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2823% 1954%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1703% 1167%
Halo: Reach 829% 553%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3916% 2721%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 3916% 2721%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4367% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 2823% 1954%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 8210.

The Radeon HD 8210 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Radeon HD 8210 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8210 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8210 has 128 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8210 transistor size technology is 52 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Radeon HD 8210 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 8210 should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The Radeon HD 8210 requires 8 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 42 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8210 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 1600M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon HD 8210.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKalindi LPG84M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date23 May 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs-
Actual Shader Performance1%vs-
Technology28nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.2 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power8 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8210 is an integrated graphics card on some of the Kabini APUs.
It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and shares the main system memory of up to 667MHz, on a 128-bit memory interface, whereas the memory bandwidth and performance will depend heavily on the laptop configuration.
The codenamed Kalindi LP Core offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs and comes optimized for low power consumption.
Even assuming the best combination possible, expect its performance to be slower than an Intel HD 3000 but never below an Intel HD 2000. Thus, the card is only suited for modest 3D games and titles like BF4, AC4 and CoD: Ghosts are unplayable.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body