Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8400 Quadro FX 1600M
Cyberpunk 2077 1911% 2050%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1755% 1884%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1965% 2107%
Genshin Impact 1929% 2069%
eFootball PES 2021 923% 994%
Marvel's Avengers 1821% 1954%
Watch Dogs Legion 1857% 1992%
FIFA 21 923% 994%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 2808% 3009%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1695% 1819%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8400 are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M.

The Radeon HD 8400 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Radeon HD 8400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8400 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8400 has 128 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8400 transistor size technology is 52 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Radeon HD 8400 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 8400 should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The Radeon HD 8400 requires 25 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 25 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8400 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 1600M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 8400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed600 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKalindiG84M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date23 May 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs-
Actual Shader Performance2%vs-
Technology28nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate4.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate2.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8400 is an integrated graphics card on some of the Kabini APUs.
It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and shares the main system memory of up to 800MHz, on a 128-bit memory interface, whereas the memory bandwidth and performance will depend heavily on the laptop configuration.
The codenamed Kalindi Core offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs.
Assuming the best combination possible, expect performance similar to an Intel HD 4000 and never below an Intel HD 3000. Thus, the card is only suited for modest 3D games and titles like BF4, AC4 and CoD: Ghosts are unplayable.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-