Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) Quadro 5000
Red Dead Redemption 2 65% 302%
Halo: Reach 48% 28%
Cyberpunk 2077 126% 453%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65% 302%
Doom Eternal 42% 246%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 126% 453%
Grand Theft Auto VI 152% 515%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2% 148%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 126% 453%
Need For Speed Heat 65% 302%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) are massively better than the Nvidia Quadro 5000.

The GTX 760 Ti has a 402 MHz higher core clock speed and 68 more Texture Mapping Units than the Quadro 5000. This results in the GTX 760 Ti providing 79.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 760 Ti has a 402 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Render Output Units than the Quadro 5000. The lower ROP count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 760 Ti manages to provide 8.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 760 Ti was released over a year more recently than the Quadro 5000, and so the GTX 760 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro 5000.

The Quadro 5000 has 512 MB more video memory than the GTX 760 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GTX 760 Ti has 72.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro 5000, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 760 Ti is much better than the Quadro 5000.

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) has 1344 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro 5000 has 352. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 760 Ti is 1317 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro 5000 is 361. The GTX 760 Ti having 956 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 760 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro 5000.

The GTX 760 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro 5000. This means that the GTX 760 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro 5000.

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) requires 170 Watts to run and the Quadro 5000 requires 152 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 760 Ti and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro 5000. The GTX 760 Ti requires 18 Watts more than the Quadro 5000 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 760 Ti to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Quadro 5000.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed915 MHzvs513 MHz
Boost Clock980 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK104-325-A2Fermi GF100-850-A3
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Poor
Release Date17 Oct 2013vs23 Feb 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
8.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440
5.9
green tick vs -
3840x2160
4.3
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2560 MB
Memory Speed1502 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs320 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192.3GB/secvs120GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1344vs352
Actual Shader Performance63%vs17%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units112vs44
Texture Rate102.5 GTexel/svs22.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs40
Pixel Rate29.3 GPixel/svs20.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power170 Wattsvs152 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 30 Ampsvs500 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM) is an OEM only high-end Graphics Card based on the Kepler GK104 (325-A2 Variant) core of the Kepler Architecture.
The 325-A2 Variant of the Kepler GK104 Core offers 1344 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface. While the central unit runs at 915MHz and goes up to 980MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1502MHz.
It's therefore a renamed GeForce GTX 670 and will offer exactly the same performance.
Quadro 5000 is a high-end professional card based on the 40nm, Fermi architecture.

It's based on the Fermi GF100-850-A3 GPU and thus offers 352 Shader Processing Units, 44 TMUs and 40 ROPs, on a 320-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 513MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 750MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 152 Watts.

Despite exhibiting similarities to GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM, due to being under-clocked and because Quadro 5000's drivers are only certified for professional applications only, its gaming performance is up to 10% slower than GeForce GTX 560.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body