Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 260 Radeon HD 6950
Red Dead Redemption 2 224% 158%
Halo: Reach 3% 18%
Cyberpunk 2077 345% 254%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 224% 158%
Doom Eternal 179% 122%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 345% 254%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 88% 90%
Grand Theft Auto VI 395% 294%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 345% 254%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 100% 59%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6950 are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 260.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 200 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 6950, but the Radeon HD 6950 has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 260. As a result, the Radeon HD 6950 exhibits a 22.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 260. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 200 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 6950, but the Radeon HD 6950 has 16 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R7 260. As a result, the Radeon HD 6950 exhibits a 9.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 260. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 260 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon HD 6950, and so the Radeon R7 260 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon HD 6950 when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 260 and the Radeon HD 6950 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon HD 6950 has 64 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R7 260, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon HD 6950 is much better than the Radeon R7 260.

The Radeon R7 260 has 768 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6950 has 1408. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 6950 is 563. The Radeon R7 260 having 90 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon HD 6950 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R7 260 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 6950. This means that the Radeon R7 260 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 6950.

The Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 6950 requires 200 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon HD 6950. The Radeon HD 6950 requires 105 Watts more than the Radeon R7 260 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon HD 6950 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R7 260.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Bonaire PROTerascale 3 Cayman Pro
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date17 Dec 2013vs15 Dec 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.7
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7.5
vs green tick
8.2
1920x1080
5.7
vs green tick
6.4
2560x1440
4
vs green tick
4.7
3840x2160
2.4
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth96GB/secvs160GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs1408
Actual Shader Performance31%vs27%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs88
Texture Rate48 GTexel/svs70.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs25.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power95 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs500 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHzvsIntel Core i7-930 Quad 2.80GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Radeon HD 6950 is a fast high-end card made in 40nm fabrification process. It is based on 40nm architecture and Cayman Pro core, featuring 1408 Shaders, 88 texture units and 32 ROPs paired with fast 2GB GDDR5 video memory working on 1250MHz, and core clock running at 800MHz. 2GB VRAM tied up with 256-bit bus ensures latest games to be playable on ultra without AA on 1080p, except Crysis 3 which requires lowering settings to be played on high.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants

Title

Body