Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8610G Quadro FX 570M
Cyberpunk 2077 1580% 2969%
Call of Duty Warzone 1123% 2134%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1769% 3313%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1580% 2969%
Minecraft: Dungeons 1191% 2259%
Maneater 951% 1821%
Valorant 20% 119%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 617% 1209%
Doom Eternal 1146% 2176%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 1077% 2050%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8610G are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 570M.

The Radeon HD 8610G was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 570M, and so the Radeon HD 8610G is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 570M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 570M has 512 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8610G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8610G has 384 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 570M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8610G transistor size technology is 48 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 570M. This means that the Radeon HD 8610G is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 570M.

The Radeon HD 8610G requires 25 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 570M requires 45 Watts. The Quadro FX 570M requires 20 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8610G to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 570M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 8610G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs475 MHz
Boost Clock626 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 3G84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date23 May 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
1920x1080
2.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs22.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs-
Actual Shader Performance12%vs-
Technology32nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs-
Texture Rate12.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate4.3 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs45 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.2vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8610G is an integrated mobile GPU, first seen on the ultra low-voltage APU A10-5745M, based on the 32nm, Terascale 3 architecture.
It offer 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a DDR3 memory interface of either a 128-bit bus width, if the laptop system RAM's is dual-channelled, or a 64-bit bus width, if not. The central units runs at 533MHz and goes up to 626MHz, in Turbo Mode. The memory clock can operate up to 667MHz, as the max memory supported by the CPU is DDR3-1333.
Its performance depends heavily on whether or not the memory is dual-channelled. Benchmarks put its performance on level with today's middle-class GPUs such as GeForce GT 540M-GeForce GT 630M or Radeon HD 7650M/7670M. Therefore, modern demanding games can be played with medium detail.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-