Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 3700M Mobility Radeon Xpress 200
Cyberpunk 2077 823% 21221%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 744% 19400%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 717% 18768%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 717% 18768%
FIFA 21 366% 10655%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 652% 17258%
Genshin Impact 823% 21221%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1199% 29900%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1224% 30466%
Watch Dogs Legion 791% 20466%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon Xpress 200.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over three years more recently than the Radeon Xpress, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon Xpress when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 768 MB more video memory than the Radeon Xpress, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 3700M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 51.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon Xpress, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is much better than the Radeon Xpress.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 128 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon Xpress 200 has 2. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is 70 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon Xpress is 0. The Quadro FX 3700M having 70 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro FX 3700M delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon Xpress.

The Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon Xpress 200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed550 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 Aug 2008vs01 Feb 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs-
Memory Bus256 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth51.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs2
Actual Shader Performance3%vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs1280x1024
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model4.0vs2.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.Notebook PCs based on AMD's mainstream notebook platform are designed to deliver real entertainment with the ultimate in HD visual performance. Superior technologies are optimized to create an immersive visual experience with improved graphics performance, fast wireless and long battery life. Add in more notebook PC choices from leading PC manufacturers and you get an incredible value one that you can only get from AMD.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants