Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 3700M Mobility Radeon 7500 64MB
Cyberpunk 2077 823% 11795%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 744% 10779%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 717% 10426%
FIFA 21 366% 5900%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 717% 10426%
Watch Dogs Legion 791% 11374%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1224% 16953%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1199% 16637%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 774% 11163%
Genshin Impact 823% 11795%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon 7500 64MB.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 7500, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 7500 when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 960 MB more video memory than the Radeon 7500, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 3700M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon 7500, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is noticeably better than the Radeon 7500.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 128 Shader Processing Units but the Radeon 7500 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts to run and the Mobility Radeon 7500 64MB requires 27 Watts. The Quadro FX 3700M requires 48 Watts more than the Radeon 7500 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 3700M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon 7500.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed550 MHzvs280 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG92MRV200
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 Aug 2008vs01 Dec 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth51.2GB/secvs1.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs-
Actual Shader Performance3%vs-
Technology65nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs27 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs7
Shader Model4.0vs-
Open GL2.1vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.Notebook PCs based on AMD's mainstream notebook platform are designed to deliver real entertainment with the ultimate in HD visual performance. Superior technologies are optimized to create an immersive visual experience with improved graphics performance, fast wireless and long battery life. Add in more notebook PC choices from leading PC manufacturers and you get an incredible value one that you can only get from AMD.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-