Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Red Dead Redemption 2 613% 98%
Cyberpunk 2077 880% 172%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 340% 22%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 880% 172%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 613% 98%
Doom Eternal 513% 70%
FIFA 20 280% 6%
Grand Theft Auto VI 990% 203%
Need For Speed Heat 613% 98%
Halo: Reach 127% 37%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI are massively better than the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile.

The GTX 675M has a 420 MHz higher core clock speed and 120 more Texture Mapping Units than the Pro Graphics. This results in the GTX 675M providing 77.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 675M has a 420 MHz higher core clock speed and 62 more Render Output Units than the Pro Graphics. This results in the GTX 675M providing 39.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Pro Graphics was released over a year more recently than the GTX 675M, and so the Pro Graphics is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 675M.

The GTX 675M has 3968 MB more video memory than the Pro Graphics, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 675M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 675M has 179.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Pro Graphics, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is massively better than the Pro Graphics.

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile has 40 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the Pro Graphics is 208 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 675M is 952. The GTX 675M having 744 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 675M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Pro Graphics.

The Pro Graphics transistor size technology is 18 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 675M. This means that the Pro Graphics is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 675M.

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile requires 47 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 675M requires 153 Watts more than the Pro Graphics to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 675M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Pro Graphics.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs620 MHz
Boost Clock1300 MHzvs-
ArchitectureHaswell GT3eFermi GF114 (x2)
OC Potential None vs None
Driver Support Ok vs -
Release Date27 Jul 2013vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeeDRAMvsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs768
Actual Shader Performance10%vs46%
Texture Mapping Units8vs128
Texture Rate1.6 GTexel/svs79.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units2vs64
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs39.7 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power47 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.0vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's HQ Haswell Processors.

The Haswell GT3 Core includes support for DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. Additionally, it also offers better Decoding Performance, when compared to its Predecessors.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GT3e which offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 2 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 200MHz and goes up to 1300MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Unlike the common Integrated Graphics Cards, this one has access to a dedicated frame buffer of 128MB of eDRAM.
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 800MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance on level with a dedicated GeForce GT 745M.
Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants