Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 7720 Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 382% 189%
Halo: Reach 53% 8%
Cyberpunk 2077 562% 297%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 382% 189%
Doom Eternal 314% 149%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 562% 297%
Grand Theft Auto VI 636% 342%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 197% 78%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 562% 297%
Need For Speed Heat 382% 189%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7720.

The HD 6870 has a 60 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 7720. This results in the HD 6870 providing 16.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 6870 has a 60 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 7720 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 6870 providing 1.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 7720 was released over a year more recently than the HD 6870, and so the Radeon HD 7720 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 6870.

The Radeon HD 7720 and the Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the Radeon HD 7720 and the Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition are the same, which means the Radeon HD 7720 and the HD 6870 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

The Radeon HD 7720 has 800 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition has 1120. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 7720 is 336 and the actual shader performance of the HD 6870 is 504. The HD 6870 having 168 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 6870 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 7720.

The Radeon HD 7720 requires 150 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon HD 7720 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 6870. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed840 MHzvs900 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Barts LETerascale 2 Barts XT
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Poor
Release Date31 Mar 2013vs01 Mar 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1050 MHzvs1050 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth134.4GB/secvs134.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units800vs1120
Actual Shader Performance16%vs24%
Texture Mapping Units40vs56
Texture Rate33.6 GTexel/svs50.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate26.9 GPixel/svs28.8 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Watts-
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 25 Ampsvs500 Watts

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron G1620 2.7GHzvsIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM6 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 7720 is a fast-middle-class GFX that's still based on the 40nm, Terascale 2 architecture.
It's based on the Barts LE Core and offers 800 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 840MHz and the memory clock operates at 1050MHz.
Therefore, it's a renamed Radeon HD 6790 and will offer exactly the same performance.
As based on the Barts LE Core, it performs better than Radeon HD 7750 (which goes against the naming) but falls behind Radeon HD 7770. It's expected to consume 150 Watt - more than Radeon HD 7750/Radeon HD 7770 and heat more, due to the higher manufacturing process. As based on the Terascale 2 architecture, it will not have nearly as much driver support as the GCN based GPUs.
Radeon HD 6870 IceQ X Edition is a special edition of the high-end Radeon HD 6870. See its page for more information about it.
Compared to the Radeon HD 6870, this Special Edition has exactly the same specifications and the only new feature is an improved cooling system which doesn't affect performance directly.
Therefore, the performance is EXACTLY like the standard Radeon HD 6870 and enough to run today's demanding games at maximum settings while Very Demanding games like Metro 2033 or Max Payne 3, will probably require reduced settings to run smoothly.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants