Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA 3600 GeForce 8200M G
Halo: Reach 4098% 4622%
Cyberpunk 2077 18048% 20317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13110% 14761%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 8048% 9067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13110% 14761%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 18048% 20317%
Doom Eternal 11258% 12678%
Grand Theft Auto VI 20085% 22608%
FIFA 20 6937% 7817%
Need For Speed Heat 13110% 14761%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GMA 3600 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 8200M G.

The GMA 3600 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 8200M G, and so the GMA 3600 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 8200M G when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GMA 3600 and the GeForce 8200M G have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GMA 3600 has 8.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 8200M G, which means that the memory performance of the GMA 3600 is marginally better than the GeForce 8200M G.

The GMA 3600 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8200M G has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the GMA 3600 is 2 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 8200M G is 3. The GeForce 8200M G having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GMA 3600 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GMA 3600 requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 8200M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureCedar Trail-
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Oct 2011vs01 Jun 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed533 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vs-
Memory Bandwidth8.5GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs8
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power13 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs10
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel GMA 3600 is a mobile GFX integrated on Atom's CedarView based CPUs.
It's based on the 32nm PowerVR architecture and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 2 TMUs and 2 ROPs. The central unit runs at 400MHz. The memory clock will operate at up to 533MHz (max memory speed supported by the CPU).
It should only be compatible with DirectX 10 & 11 via software as it's not based in a Shader unified architecture.
None of today's modern demanding games are playable and even modest games will be trouble for this GPU. Its performance is surprisingly below AMD's and NVIDIA's 2008 entry-level/motherboard GPUs.
GeForce 8400M GT is an on-board GPU part of the 8000M Series released by NVIDIA, in 2007.
Only less demanding games can be played smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body