Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 6850 Sapphire 1GB Edition | GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 265% | 265% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 233% | 233% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 223% | 223% |
Hitman 3 | 374% | 374% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 413% | 413% |
FIFA 21 | 84% | 84% |
Far Cry 6 | 427% | 427% |
Genshin Impact | 265% | 265% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 423% | 423% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 252% | 252% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the HD 6850 and the GTX 650 Ti are equal.
The GTX 650 Ti has a 153 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 6850. This results in the GTX 650 Ti providing 22.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 650 Ti has a 153 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 6850, but the HD 6850 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 650 Ti. As a result, the HD 6850 exhibits a 10 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 650 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 650 Ti was released over a year more recently than the HD 6850, and so the GTX 650 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 6850.
The Radeon HD 6850 Sapphire 1GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II 1GB Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The HD 6850 has 41.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 650 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the HD 6850 is noticeably better than the GTX 650 Ti.
The Radeon HD 6850 Sapphire 1GB Edition has 960 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II 1GB Edition has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 6850 is 372 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 650 Ti is 713. The GTX 650 Ti having 341 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 6850 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The GTX 650 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 6850. This means that the GTX 650 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 6850. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GTX 650 Ti should consume less power than the HD 6850.
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II 1GB Edition requires 150 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 6850. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 6850.
Core Speed | 775 MHz | vs | ![]() | 928 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | Terascale 2 Barts Pro | Kepler GK106-220-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | ![]() |
Good | |
Release Date | 01 Oct 2010 | vs | ![]() | 01 Oct 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
7
|
1920x1080 | 5.5
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
5.5
|
2560x1440 | 3.7
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
3.7
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
2.4
|
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1350 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 128GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 86.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 256 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 960 | ![]() | vs | 768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 18% | vs | ![]() | 34% | |
Technology | 40nm | vs | ![]() | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 37.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 59.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 24.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 14.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | 150 Watts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts | - |
DirectX | 11.0 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-760 2.8GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1680x1050 | ![]() | vs | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon HD 6850 Sapphire 1GB Edition is a special edition of the Radeon HD 6850. See the page of the standard edition for more information about it. There are no new features that affect Radeon HD 6850 Sapphire 1GB Edition's gaming performance directly and so its performance is exactly like the one the standard Radeon HD 6850 delivers. | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 650 Ti. The only new feature is the Dual Fan Cooling that drives 11% greater airflow while maintaining 14% quieter performance, according to Asus. Therefore, the performance is on level with the reference GeForce GTX 650 Ti. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |