Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon IGP 320M GeForce Go 7200
Halo: Reach 10525% 5762%
Cyberpunk 2077 45838% 25245%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33338% 18348%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 20525% 11279%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33338% 18348%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 45838% 25245%
Doom Eternal 28650% 15762%
Grand Theft Auto VI 50994% 28090%
FIFA 20 17713% 9728%
Need For Speed Heat 33338% 18348%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce Go 7200 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon IGP 320M.

The GeForce Go 7200 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon IGP 320M, and so the GeForce Go 7200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon IGP 320M when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce Go 7200 has 64 MB video memory, but the Radeon IGP 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon IGP 320M has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce Go 7200 has 0. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed160 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS200G72M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Oct 2002vs01 Sep 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs64 MB
Memory Speed-vs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs32 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs9
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.4vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon IGP 320M is a very old integrated GPU in Athlon XP Processors.
It offers 2 Pixel Shaders, 3 TMUs and 1 ROP on a 64-bit memory interface of (S)DDR. The central unit runs at 160MHz and the operating speed of the memory clock will depend on the system's RAM. The GPU can offer up to 128MB of shared memory, if the system RAM allows it.
Its performance is very limited and even today's forgiving games aren't playable since Radeon IGP 320M does not support DirectX 9.0.
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 is the weakest GPU in the GeForce 7000 Series. With only up to 32MB of dedicated memory, it's already doomed from the start.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body