Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon IGP 320M Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 35213% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 32197% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 31150% 717%
Watch Dogs Legion 33963% 791%
FIFA 21 17713% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 31150% 717%
Godfall 57244% 1399%
Grand Theft Auto VI 49588% 1199%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 50525% 1224%
Genshin Impact 35213% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the AMD Radeon IGP 320M.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over three years more recently than the Radeon IGP 320M, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon IGP 320M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 1024 MB video memory, but the Radeon IGP 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon IGP 320M has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 3700M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon IGP 320M is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is 70. The Quadro FX 3700M having 70 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro FX 3700M delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon IGP 320M.

The Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon IGP 320M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed160 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS200G92M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Oct 2002vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs128
Actual Shader Performance-vs3%
Technology-vs65nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs10
Shader Model-vs4.0
Open GL1.4vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon IGP 320M is a very old integrated GPU in Athlon XP Processors.
It offers 2 Pixel Shaders, 3 TMUs and 1 ROP on a 64-bit memory interface of (S)DDR. The central unit runs at 160MHz and the operating speed of the memory clock will depend on the system's RAM. The GPU can offer up to 128MB of shared memory, if the system RAM allows it.
Its performance is very limited and even today's forgiving games aren't playable since Radeon IGP 320M does not support DirectX 9.0.
The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-