Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon IGP 320M Intel GM965 Express Chipset
Cyberpunk 2077 45838% 16605%
Call of Duty Warzone 33338% 12059%
Minecraft: Dungeons 35213% 12741%
Grand Theft Auto VI 50994% 18480%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 45838% 16605%
Valorant 3181% 1093%
Maneater 28650% 10355%
Phantasy Star Online 2 4588% 1605%
Doom Eternal 33963% 12286%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 32088% 11605%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GM965 Express Chipset are massively better than the AMD Radeon IGP 320M.

The GM965 Express Chipset was released over three years more recently than the Radeon IGP 320M, and so the GM965 Express Chipset is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon IGP 320M when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon IGP 320M and the GM965 Express Chipset have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GM965 Express Chipset has 10.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon IGP 320M, which means that the memory performance of the GM965 Express Chipset is slightly better than the Radeon IGP 320M.

The Radeon IGP 320M has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GM965 Express Chipset has 0. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The GM965 Express Chipset requires 14 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon IGP 320M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed160 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS200-
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date05 Oct 2002vs01 May 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed-vs333 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs10.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-14 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs10
Shader Model-vs4.0
Open GL1.4vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon IGP 320M is a very old integrated GPU in Athlon XP Processors.
It offers 2 Pixel Shaders, 3 TMUs and 1 ROP on a 64-bit memory interface of (S)DDR. The central unit runs at 160MHz and the operating speed of the memory clock will depend on the system's RAM. The GPU can offer up to 128MB of shared memory, if the system RAM allows it.
Its performance is very limited and even today's forgiving games aren't playable since Radeon IGP 320M does not support DirectX 9.0.
Intel GM965 Express Chipset comes with most Core 2 Duo Mobile and with an integrated GMA X3100. Its performance is horrible and not recommended to any of today's games.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-