Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 4830 GeForce 320M
Cyberpunk 2077 1645% 2389%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1510% 2197%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1691% 2456%
Genshin Impact 1660% 2411%
eFootball PES 2021 788% 1167%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 2423% 3500%
Watch Dogs Legion 1598% 2322%
FIFA 21 788% 1167%
Marvel's Avengers 1567% 2278%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1458% 2122%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4830 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The Radeon HD has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GeForce 320M was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD, and so the GeForce 320M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and the GeForce 320M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce 320M has 21.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 320M is slightly better than the Radeon HD.

The GeForce 320M has 48 Shader Processing Units but the Radeon HD does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-Tesla MCP89
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date03 Mar 2009vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.4
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.7
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.1

GPU Memory

Memory-vsN/A
Memory Speed-vs667 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs48
Actual Shader Performance-vs2%
Technology-vs40nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs16
Texture Rate-vs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs8
Pixel Rate-vs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX-vs10.0
Shader Model-vs4.1
Open GL-vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-