Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon X1300 LE | Radeon X1050 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8660% | 7640% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 7912% | 6979% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 7652% | 6749% |
Hitman 3 | 11295% | 9968% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 12226% | 10790% |
FIFA 21 | 4319% | 3804% |
Far Cry 6 | 12574% | 11099% |
Genshin Impact | 8660% | 7640% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 12458% | 10996% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 8350% | 7366% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1050 are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon X1300 LE .
The Radeon X1050 was released over a year more recently than the X1300 LE, and so the Radeon X1050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the X1300 LE.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Radeon X1050 has 64 MB more video memory than the X1300 LE, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Radeon X1050 also has superior memory performance overall.
The Radeon X1050 has 3.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the X1300 LE, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon X1050 is marginally better than the X1300 LE.
Both the Radeon X1300 LE and the Radeon X1050 have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.
The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the X1300 LE. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the X1300 LE.
Core Speed | 450 MHz | ![]() | vs | 400 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | RV515 LE | RV370 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 05 Oct 2005 | vs | ![]() | 07 Dec 2006 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | 64 MB | vs | ![]() | 128 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 250 MHz | vs | ![]() | 333 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR | vs | ![]() | DDR2 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 2GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 5.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | - | vs | - | ||
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 0% |
Technology | - | vs | ![]() | 110nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | - | vs | ![]() | 4 | |
Texture Rate | - | vs | ![]() | 1.6 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | - | vs | ![]() | 4 | |
Pixel Rate | - | vs | ![]() | 1.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | - | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | 24 Watts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 300 Watts & 18 Amps |
DirectX | 9 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 3.0 | ![]() | vs | 2.0 | |
Open GL | 2.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2.0 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon X1300 LE is an entry-level GPU based on the 90nm variant of the R500 architecture. It's based on the RV515 LE Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 450MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 250MHz. Radeon X1300 LE is oriented for low power consumption. It does not offer any DVI ports and its performance is expected to be lower than X1050 GPUs and is therefore not suited for any 3D gaming, at all. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported. | Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture. It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt. Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |