Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 4250
Red Dead Redemption 2 4698% 4512%
Cyberpunk 2077 6492% 6236%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2860% 2745%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6492% 6236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4698% 4512%
Doom Eternal 4026% 3866%
FIFA 20 2456% 2357%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7232% 6947%
Need For Speed Heat 4698% 4512%
Halo: Reach 1425% 1366%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4250 are marginally better than the AMD Radeon HD 2400 XT .

The HD 2400 XT has a 90 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Radeon HD 4250. This results in the HD 2400 XT providing 0.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 2400 XT has a 90 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 4250 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 2400 XT providing 0.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over a year more recently than the HD 2400 XT, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 2400 XT.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 256 MB more video memory than the HD 2400 XT, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the HD 2400 XT has superior memory performance.

The HD 2400 XT has 8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 XT is marginally better than the Radeon HD 4250.

Both the Radeon HD 2400 XT and the Radeon HD 4250 have 40 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the HD 2400 XT is 26 and by the Radeon HD 4250 is 15. Knowing that the shader performance of the HD 2400 XT is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Radeon HD 4250 transistor size technology is 10 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 2400 XT. This means that the Radeon HD 4250 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 2400 XT. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 4250 should consume less power than the HD 2400 XT.

The Radeon HD 2400 XT requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 4250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs560 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRV610RS880
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 Jun 2007vs30 Mar 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed500 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs32 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth8GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs40
Actual Shader Performance1%vs1%
Technology65nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs4
Texture Rate2.6 GTexel/svs2.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.6 GPixel/svs2.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10.1
Shader Model4.0vs4.1
Open GL3.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium D 950 3.4GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 2400 XT is an entry-level GPU based on the 65nm variant of the second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RV610 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 64-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. The central unit runs at 650MHz and the memory clock runs at up to 500MHz. It's therefore a higher clocked Radeon HD 2400 Pro, paired with GDDR3 and should be considerably faster.
Today's games only playable at unattractive resolutions and using low (likely) or medium (maybe) presets. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Radeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body