Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 9800M GT SLI Mobility FireGL T2
Cyberpunk 2077 742% 7144%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 670% 6525%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 645% 6310%
FIFA 21 325% 3554%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 645% 6310%
Watch Dogs Legion 712% 6887%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1107% 10285%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 697% 6759%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1085% 10092%
Genshin Impact 742% 7144%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 9800M GT SLI are massively better than the AMD Mobility FireGL T2.

The 9800M GT was released over three years more recently than the Mobility FireGL T2, and so the 9800M GT is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Mobility FireGL T2 when running the latest games.

The 9800M GT has 896 MB more video memory than the Mobility FireGL T2, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the 9800M GT also has superior memory performance overall.

The 9800M GT has 99.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Mobility FireGL T2, which means that the memory performance of the 9800M GT is massively better than the Mobility FireGL T2.

The GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 192 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility FireGL T2 has 2. However, the actual shader performance of the 9800M GT is 96 and the actual shader performance of the Mobility FireGL T2 is 1. The 9800M GT having 95 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the 9800M GT delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Mobility FireGL T2.

The GeForce 9800M GT SLI requires 130 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility FireGL T2.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed500 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG92 (x2)-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jul 2008vs01 Nov 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth102.4GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units192vs2
Actual Shader Performance5%vs0%
Technology65nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power130 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs9
Shader Model4.0vs2.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce 9800M GT SLI is a solution of two GeForce 9800M GT put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce 9800M GT to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce 9800M GT performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce 9800M GT.
A few demanding games will run at the highest settings with fluent frame rates (30+) but overall most games will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
The FireGL line is designed for multimedia content creation programs, such as 3DS Max, mechanical engineering design software such as Solidworks, and civil engineering architectural software such as Chief Architect, whereas Radeon counterparts are suited towards video games. FireGL drivers were built with maximum image quality and pixel precision[citation needed], with CAD specific functionalities such as the recently introduced AutoDetection Technology to tune the parameters inside the driver to achieve maximum performance for predefined list of software. However, because the drivers are also based on the Catalyst drivers made for the Radeon line, it makes them suitable for gaming, at the expense of probable compatibility issues with the very latest games due to the age of the drivers, with FireGL cards in theory pushing more data than their Radeon gaming counterparts
The ATI FireGL range of video cards, renamed to FirePro 3D in late 2008, is the series specifically for CAD (Computer Aided Design) and DCC (Digital Content Creation) software, usually found in workstations.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-