Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon X1270 Radeon 9250
Red Dead Redemption 2 19715% 9540%
Halo: Reach 6196% 2963%
Cyberpunk 2077 27122% 13143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19715% 9540%
Doom Eternal 16937% 8188%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 27122% 13143%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 663% 271%
Grand Theft Auto VI 30178% 14630%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 27122% 13143%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 12122% 5846%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are massively better than the AMD Radeon X1270.

The Radeon X1270 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the Radeon X1270 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 9250 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1270 and the Radeon 9250 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon 9250 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon X1270, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon 9250 is marginally better than the Radeon X1270.

The Radeon 9250 has 4 Shader Processing Units but the Radeon X1270 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon X1270 requires 14 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon 9250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-RV280
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Feb 2007vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power14 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs8.1
Shader Model2.0vs1.4
Open GL2.0vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThis GPU was intended to be an overclocked and tweaked Radeon Xpress 1200 but it was never released and it does not exist.The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body