Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 485M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Red Dead Redemption 2 102% 98%
Cyberpunk 2077 177% 172%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 25% 22%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 177% 172%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102% 98%
Doom Eternal 74% 70%
FIFA 20 8% 6%
Grand Theft Auto VI 208% 203%
Need For Speed Heat 102% 98%
Halo: Reach 36% 37%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M SLI.

The GTX 675M has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GTX 485M. This results in the GTX 675M providing 5.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 675M has a 45 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 485M and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 675M providing 2.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 675M was released over a year more recently than the GTX 485M, and so the GTX 675M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 485M.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the GeForce GTX 485M SLI and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI are the same, which means the GTX 485M and the GTX 675M have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

Both the GeForce GTX 485M SLI and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 675M is 952 and by the GTX 485M is 952. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 675M is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI requires 200 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs620 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF104-N12E-GTX-A1 (x2)Fermi GF114 (x2)
OC Potential None vs None
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date01 Jan 2011vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
9.3
1920x1080
7.2
vs green tick
7.3
2560x1440 - vs green tick
5.3
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed750 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs768
Actual Shader Performance42%vs46%
Technology40nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units128vs128
Texture Rate73.6 GTexel/svs79.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs64
Pixel Rate36.8 GPixel/svs39.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-2630QM 4-Core 2.0GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 485M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 485M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 485M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 485M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 485M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body