Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon X1050 | Radeon X300 Series |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7640% | 11671% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 6979% | 10666% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 6749% | 10317% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 10790% | 16463% |
FIFA 21 | 3804% | 5838% |
Genshin Impact | 7640% | 11671% |
Far Cry 6 | 11099% | 16931% |
Hitman 3 | 9968% | 15213% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 7366% | 11254% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 10996% | 16775% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1050 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon X300 Series.
The Radeon X1050 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon X300 Series, and so the Radeon X1050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon X300 Series.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Radeon X1050 and the Radeon X300 Series have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The Radeon X300 Series has 1.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon X1050, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon X300 Series is marginally better than the Radeon X1050.
Both the Radeon X1050 and the Radeon X300 Series have 4 Shader Processing Units. Having the same number of SPUs and using the same architecture means that the performance they offer can be compared by looking at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.
The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon X300 Series. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050.
Core Speed | 400 MHz | ![]() | vs | 325 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | RV370 | RV370 | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | - | |
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 07 Dec 2006 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jun 2004 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | 128 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 333 MHz | vs | ![]() | 400 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR2 | ![]() | vs | DDR | |
Memory Bandwidth | 5.3GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 6.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | - | vs | - | ||
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 0% |
Technology | 110nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 1.6 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 1.6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1600x1200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 24 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 18 Amps | - |
DirectX | 9 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 2.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2.0 |
Open GL | 2.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2.0 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture. It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt. Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported. | The Radeon R300 (introduced August 2002) is the third generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The line features 3D acceleration based upon Direct3D 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R200 design. R300 was the first fully Direct3D 9-capable consumer graphics chip. The processors also include 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. R300 refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. R300 and its derivatives would form the basis for ATI's consumer and professional product lines for over 3 years. The integrated graphics processor based upon R300 is called Xpress 200. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |