Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon X1050 GeForce 4 MX 4000
Cyberpunk 2077 7640% 19053%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 6979% 17417%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6749% 16849%
FIFA 21 3804% 9561%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10790% 26849%
Far Cry 6 11099% 27612%
Genshin Impact 7640% 19053%
Hitman 3 9968% 24815%
Watch Dogs Legion 7366% 18375%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 10996% 27358%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1050 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 4 MX 4000.

The Radeon X1050 was released over a year more recently than the 4 MX, and so the Radeon X1050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 4 MX.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1050 and the GeForce 4 MX 4000 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon X1050 has 4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 4 MX, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon X1050 is marginally better than the 4 MX.

The Radeon X1050 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 4 MX 4000 has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 4 MX 4000. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs250 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRV370NV18
OC Potential Fair vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date07 Dec 2006vs14 Dec 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed333 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth5.3GB/secvs1.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology110nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs1600x1200
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power24 Watts-
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 18 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX9vs7.0
Shader Model2.0vs-
Open GL2.0vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture.
It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
GeForce4 MX 4000 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 7 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games. Still, games before 2003 should be fully playable at max settings....
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-