Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 675M SLI Quadro K3000M
Red Dead Redemption 2 98% 588%
Halo: Reach 37% 119%
Cyberpunk 2077 172% 845%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98% 588%
Doom Eternal 70% 492%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 172% 845%
Grand Theft Auto VI 203% 951%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 22% 324%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 172% 845%
Need For Speed Heat 98% 588%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI are massively better than the Nvidia Quadro K3000M.

The Quadro K3000M was released less than a year after the GTX 675M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 675M has 2048 MB more video memory than the Quadro K3000M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 675M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 675M has 102.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro K3000M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is massively better than the Quadro K3000M.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 768 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K3000M has 576. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 675M is 952 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K3000M is 377. The GTX 675M having 575 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 675M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro K3000M.

The Quadro K3000M transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 675M. This means that the Quadro K3000M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 675M.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts to run and the Quadro K3000M requires 75 Watts. The GTX 675M requires 125 Watts more than the Quadro K3000M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 675M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Quadro K3000M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed620 MHzvs654 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF114 (x2)Kepler GK104
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Good
Release Date22 Mar 2012vs01 Jun 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
9.3
green tick vs -
1920x1080
7.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
5.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed750 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192GB/secvs89.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs576
Actual Shader Performance46%vs18%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units128vs-
Texture Rate79.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units64vs-
Pixel Rate39.7 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.1vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Quadro K3000M is a high-end business card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
Technically the successor to the previous Quadro 3000M, it's based on the Kepler GK104 (despite the SPU count) and offers 576 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 700MHz.
Quadro K3000M's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is slightly above GeForce GTX 660M.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body