Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 285M
Red Dead Redemption 2 98% 657%
Halo: Reach 37% 141%
Cyberpunk 2077 172% 940%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98% 657%
Doom Eternal 70% 551%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 172% 940%
Grand Theft Auto VI 203% 1057%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 22% 367%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 172% 940%
Need For Speed Heat 98% 657%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285M.

The GTX 675M has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed and 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 285M. This results in the GTX 675M providing 41 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 675M has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 285M. This results in the GTX 675M providing 30.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 675M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 285M, and so the GTX 675M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 285M.

The GTX 675M has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 285M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 675M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 675M has 128 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 285M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is massively better than the GeForce GTX 285M.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 285M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 675M is 952 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 285M is 192. The GTX 675M having 760 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 675M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 285M.

The GTX 675M transistor size technology is 25 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 285M. This means that the GTX 675M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 285M.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 285M requires 75 Watts. The GTX 675M requires 125 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 285M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 675M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 285M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed620 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF114 (x2)Tesla G92-N10E-GTX1-B1
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date22 Mar 2012vs01 Feb 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
9.3
green tick vs -
1920x1080
7.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
5.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed750 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus512 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth192GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs128
Actual Shader Performance46%vs9%
Technology40nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units128vs64
Texture Rate79.4 GTexel/svs38.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs16
Pixel Rate39.7 GPixel/svs9.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power200 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.1vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
GeForce GTX 285M is a high-end GPU based on the first shader unified architecture.
It's based on the G92b Core and therefore offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs on a 256-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. Its central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at 1000MHz. It's therefore related to GeForce 9800 GTX and should perform considerably worse due to its lower central unit but it only ends up being 1-2% slower due to extended driver support.
Compared to GeForce GTX 280M it's only marginally faster but should remain within the same power envelope.
Most modern demanding games, at the time of its release, such as Crysis were playable at the highest settings using a 720p+ resolution. Therefore, today's modern demanding games should still run fluently at medium settings. However, DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body