Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8510G Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1426% 1954%
Doom Eternal 1212% 1666%
Cyberpunk 2077 1997% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1426% 1954%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 842% 1167%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1997% 2721%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 1997% 2721%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2232% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 1426% 1954%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 41% 21%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8510G are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M.

The Radeon HD 8510G was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Radeon HD 8510G is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8510G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8510G has 384 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 8510G transistor size technology is 48 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Radeon HD 8510G is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 8510G should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 8510G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock554 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 3G84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed-vs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth-vs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs-
Actual Shader Performance10%vs-
Technology32nmvs80nm
Texture Mapping Units16vs-
Texture Rate7.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.2vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 8510G is featured in some ULV APUs.
Not much is known about it at the moment but it's performance is close to Radeon HD 7660G, according to AMD.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body