Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) Quadro NVS 310
Cyberpunk 2077 414% 2643%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 370% 2408%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 355% 2327%
FIFA 21 159% 1283%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 355% 2327%
Watch Dogs Legion 395% 2546%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 636% 3832%
Grand Theft Auto VI 623% 3759%
Genshin Impact 414% 2643%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 386% 2497%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) are massively better than the Nvidia Quadro NVS 310.

The HD 8740 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the Quadro NVS 310. This results in the HD 8740 providing 21.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 8740 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed and 12 more Render Output Units than the Quadro NVS 310. This results in the HD 8740 providing 10.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 8740 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro NVS 310, and so the HD 8740 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro NVS 310.

The HD 8740 has 1536 MB more video memory than the Quadro NVS 310, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 8740 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 8740 has 58 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro NVS 310, which means that the memory performance of the HD 8740 is much better than the Quadro NVS 310.

The Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro NVS 310 has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 8740 is 348 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro NVS 310 is 53. The HD 8740 having 295 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 8740 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro NVS 310.

The HD 8740 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro NVS 310. This means that the HD 8740 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro NVS 310.

The Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) requires 55 Watts to run and the Quadro NVS 310 requires 20 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the HD 8740. The HD 8740 requires 35 Watts more than the Quadro NVS 310 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 8740 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Quadro NVS 310.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed800 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Cape Verde PROFermi GF119
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Poor
Release Date05 Sep 2013vs01 Jun 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed1125 MHzvs875 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth72GB/secvs14GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs48
Actual Shader Performance17%vs3%
Texture Mapping Units32vs8
Texture Rate25.6 GTexel/svs4.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs4
Pixel Rate12.8 GPixel/svs2.2 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs20 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 27 Amps-

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-3210 3.2GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) is an OEM Only, Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the First Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

The GCN Architecture succeeds the 40nm Terascale Architecture. In addition to being produced with a 28nm Technology, the GCN Architecture adds other Technologies that allow for energy efficiency. For example, ZeroCore Power, a long idle power saving technology, allows the Graphics Cards to shut down by itself when the Monitor is turned off.
GCN also adds Improved Anisotropic Filtering, DirectX 11 Tessellation and the Partially Resident Textures (PRT) Technology, which enables future games to utilize ultra-high resolution textures with the same performance as today's small and often repetitive textures.

It equips a GPU Codenamed Cape Verde PRO which has 8 Compute Units activated and thus offers 512 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 800MHz.

The GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1125MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 55W, it requires at least a 400W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon HD 7750 and performs exactly like it.

System Suggestions
Radeon HD 8740 (OEM) is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Decent Processor (Intel Core i3 Quad Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Quadro NVS 310 is a professional Graphics Card certified for professional applications.
Its drivers are not optimized for gaming purposes but rather for the use of professional applications. Its core, the Fermi GF119, is used on the GeForce 510 and therefore its performance is comparable but only slightly better, due to not benefiting from gaming optimizations that GeForce 510 does.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants