Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 2000 GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 5975% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5456% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5276% 17757%
FIFA 21 2965% 10079%
Watch Dogs Legion 5760% 19364%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 5276% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 8610% 28829%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8448% 28293%
Godfall 9766% 32668%
Genshin Impact 5975% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 2000 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the FX 2000, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FX 2000.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 2000 and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The FX 2000 has 10 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the FX 2000 is marginally better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The Quadro FX 2000 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV30GLNV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jan 2003vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0avs9.0c
Shader Model2.0vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro FX 2000 is a professional GPU with special drivers certified for certain professional applications which aren't even produced anymore.
The chip offers slow DDR2 on a 128-bit memory interface and 4 Pixel Shaders. Its gaming performance is beneath today's integrated solutions.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-