Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 2000 Riva TNT2 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 5653% 27336%
Cyberpunk 2077 7803% 37592%
Doom Eternal 4846% 23490%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 3448% 16823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5653% 27336%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 7803% 37592%
FIFA 20 2965% 14515%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8690% 41823%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 7803% 37592%
Need For Speed Heat 5653% 27336%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 2000 are massively better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The FX 2000 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the FX 2000 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The FX 2000 has 96 MB more video memory than the Riva TNT2 Pro, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FX 2000 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FX 2000 has 10.1 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Riva TNT2 Pro, which means that the memory performance of the FX 2000 is slightly better than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Quadro FX 2000 has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Riva TNT2 Pro has 2. However, the actual shader performance of the FX 2000 is 2 and the actual shader performance of the Riva TNT2 Pro is 0. The FX 2000 having 2 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FX 2000 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Riva TNT2 Pro.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV30GLNV5
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jan 2003vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs32 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0avs6.0
Shader Model2.0vs-
Open GL1.5vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro FX 2000 is a professional GPU with special drivers certified for certain professional applications which aren't even produced anymore.
The chip offers slow DDR2 on a 128-bit memory interface and 4 Pixel Shaders. Its gaming performance is beneath today's integrated solutions.
The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body