Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 82845G Intel 865G
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 19725%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 18032%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 17444%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 27795%
FIFA 21 14150% 9900%
Genshin Impact 28150% 19725%
Far Cry 6 40775% 28584%
Hitman 3 36650% 25689%
Watch Dogs Legion 27150% 19023%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 40400% 28321%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 865G are significantly better than the Intel 82845G.

The 865G was released less than a year after the 82845G, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G has 16 MB video memory, but the 82845G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The 82845G has 2 Shader Processing Units and the 865G has 0. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The 82845G requires 6 Watts to run and the 865G requires 13 Watts. The 865G requires 7 Watts more than the 82845G to run. The difference is not significant enough for the 865G to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the 82845G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureBrookdaleSpringdale
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2002vs01 May 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed133 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1.1GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1280x1024
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power6 Wattsvs13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs7.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL1.3vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 82845G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Celeron and Celeron D CPUs and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 and the performance depends on the CPU it's embedded. It only supports DDR so the memory bandwidth is really low.
Today's modern games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-