Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel 82845G GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 17757%
FIFA 21 14150% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 24900% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 40400% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 27150% 19364%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 26650% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 28293%
Genshin Impact 28150% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache are significantly better than the Intel 82845G.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the 82845G, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 82845G.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 128 MB video memory, but the 82845G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The 82845G has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the 82845G is 0 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 2 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the 82845G.

The 82845G requires 6 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureBrookdaleNV44
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2002vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed133 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1.1GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power6 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7.0vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.3vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel 82845G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Celeron and Celeron D CPUs and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 and the performance depends on the CPU it's embedded. It only supports DDR so the memory bandwidth is really low.
Today's modern games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-