Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6500 Rage 128 Ultra 16MB
Cyberpunk 2077 18425% 28150%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 16843% 25738%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 16293% 24900%
FIFA 21 9244% 14150%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 16293% 24900%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 26457% 40400%
Watch Dogs Legion 17769% 27150%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 17441% 26650%
Grand Theft Auto VI 25966% 39650%
Genshin Impact 18425% 28150%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6500 are significantly better than the AMD Rage 128 Ultra 16MB.

The GeForce 6500 was released over three years more recently than the 128 Ultra, and so the GeForce 6500 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 128 Ultra when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6500 has 240 MB more video memory than the 128 Ultra, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6500 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6500 has 4.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 128 Ultra, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6500 is marginally better than the 128 Ultra.

The GeForce 6500 has 4 Shader Processing Units but the 128 Ultra does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs90 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV44-
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date02 Jan 2005vs01 Aug 1998
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs16 MB
Memory Speed333 MHzvs130 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth5.3GB/secvs1GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs-
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs1600x1200
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs6
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL1.5vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications. AMD desktop processors ignite the next generation of solutions. Whether it's playing games, cloud computing or editing home videos, enjoy a better experience with AMD multi-core processors.
Redefine the way you play on your desktop computer and take HD gaming to the extreme with the performance of ATI graphics cards from AMD.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-