Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Rage 128 Ultra 16MB GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 28150% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 25738% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 24900% 17757%
FIFA 21 14150% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 24900% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 40400% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 27150% 19364%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 26650% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 39650% 28293%
Genshin Impact 28150% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache are significantly better than the AMD Rage 128 Ultra 16MB.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over three years more recently than the 128 Ultra, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 128 Ultra when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 112 MB more video memory than the 128 Ultra, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 1.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 128 Ultra, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the 128 Ultra.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7 Shader Processing Units but the 128 Ultra does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed90 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV44
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Aug 1998vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory16 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed130 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX6vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewAMD desktop processors ignite the next generation of solutions. Whether it's playing games, cloud computing or editing home videos, enjoy a better experience with AMD multi-core processors.
Redefine the way you play on your desktop computer and take HD gaming to the extreme with the performance of ATI graphics cards from AMD.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-