Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 2 MX 400 64MB GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 18126% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 16569% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 16029% 17757%
Watch Dogs Legion 17481% 19364%
FIFA 21 9094% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 16029% 17757%
Godfall 29497% 32668%
Grand Theft Auto VI 25545% 28293%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 26029% 28829%
Genshin Impact 18126% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 2 MX 400 64MB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over three years more recently than the 2 MX, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 2 MX when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 64 MB more video memory than the 2 MX, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 1.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 2 MX, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the 2 MX.

The GeForce 2 MX 400 64MB has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the 2 MX is 0 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 2 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 6200 TurboCache delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the 2 MX.

The GeForce 2 MX 400 64MB requires 4 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed200 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV11NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date03 Mar 2001vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed166 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth1.3GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)1600x1200vs2560x1600
VGA Connections2vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power4 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX7vs9.0c
Shader Model-vs3.0
Open GL1.2vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce 2 MX 400 64MB is part of the GeForce2 Series released by NVIDIA in 2000/2001. With very few dedicated memory and only DirectX 7.0 (and less) support, even games from 2002 will require reduced settings. Therefore, it can't play today's current games.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-