Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 3200 IGP Intel 865G
Cyberpunk 2077 5911% 19725%
Hitman 3 7719% 25689%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5397% 18032%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5219% 17444%
FIFA 21 2932% 9900%
Grand Theft Auto VI 8357% 27795%
Far Cry 6 8597% 28584%
Genshin Impact 5911% 19725%
Battlefield 6 7719% 25689%
Resident Evil 8 5911% 19725%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 3200 IGP are massively better than the Intel 865G.

The HD 3200 was released over three years more recently than the 865G, and so the HD 3200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 865G when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G has 16 MB video memory, but the HD 3200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD 3200 has 40 Shader Processing Units but the 865G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 3200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed500 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS780Springdale
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Mar 2008vs01 May 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed-vs-
Memory Bus32 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs-
Actual Shader Performance1%vs-
Technology55nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate2 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1280x1024
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs7.0
Shader Model4.1vs-
Open GL3.3vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 3200 is an integrated GPU on the AMD 780G Chipset which is based on the 55nm, second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RS780 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or GDDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 500MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 3200's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 3200 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 3300. However, the most common versions, unlike Radeon HD 3300, are equipped with DDR2. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-