Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1100 128mb GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 22500% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20570% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 19900% 17757%
FIFA 21 11300% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 19900% 17757%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 32300% 28829%
Watch Dogs Legion 21700% 19364%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 21300% 19007%
Grand Theft Auto VI 31700% 28293%
Genshin Impact 22500% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1100 128mb.

The Xpress 1100 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, and so the Xpress 1100 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon Xpress 1100 128mb and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 2.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Xpress 1100, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is marginally better than the Xpress 1100.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7 Shader Processing Units but the Xpress 1100 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV44
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2006vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs7
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs9.0c
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.0vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Radeon R300 (introduced August 2002) is the third generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The line features 3D acceleration based upon Direct3D 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R200 design. R300 was the first fully Direct3D 9-capable consumer graphics chip. The processors also include 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. R300 refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. R300 and its derivatives would form the basis for ATI's consumer and professional product lines for over 3 years.
The integrated graphics processor based upon R300 is called Xpress 200.
The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-