Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GM965 Express Chipset Quadro FX 350M
Cyberpunk 2077 16605% 21204%
Call of Duty Warzone 12059% 15407%
Minecraft: Dungeons 12741% 16277%
Grand Theft Auto VI 18480% 23596%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 16605% 21204%
Valorant 1093% 1422%
Maneater 10355% 13233%
Phantasy Star Online 2 1605% 2074%
Doom Eternal 12286% 15697%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 11605% 14828%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GM965 Express Chipset are noticeably better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 350M.

The GM965 Express Chipset was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 350M, and so the GM965 Express Chipset is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 350M.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB video memory, but the GM965 Express Chipset does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the GM965 Express Chipset and the Quadro FX 350M have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The GM965 Express Chipset requires 14 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 350M requires 15 Watts. The Quadro FX 350M requires 1 Watts more than the GM965 Express Chipset to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 350M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GM965 Express Chipset.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed500 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-G72GLM
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 May 2007vs31 Mar 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed333 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth10.7GB/secvs5.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power14 Wattsvs15 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL2.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel GM965 Express Chipset comes with most Core 2 Duo Mobile and with an integrated GMA X3100. Its performance is horrible and not recommended to any of today's games.The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-