Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1200 Series Radeon 9250
Red Dead Redemption 2 35567% 9540%
Doom Eternal 30567% 8188%
Cyberpunk 2077 48900% 13143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35567% 9540%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 21900% 5846%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 48900% 13143%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 48900% 13143%
Grand Theft Auto VI 54400% 14630%
Need For Speed Heat 35567% 9540%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 1273% 271%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1200 Series.

The Xpress 1200 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the Xpress 1200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 9250 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon 9250 has 128 MB video memory, but the Xpress 1200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Radeon Xpress 1200 Series and the Radeon 9250 have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS690CRV280
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date28 Feb 2007vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs8.1
Shader Model3.0vs1.4
Open GL2.0vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewATI's 'R520' core (codenamed Fudo) is the foundation for a line of DirectX 9.0c and OpenGL 2.0 3D accelerator X1000 video cards. It is ATI's first major architectural overhaul since the 'R300' core and is highly optimized for Shader Model 3.0. The Radeon X1000 series using the core was introduced on October 5, 2005, and competed primarily against nVidia's GeForce 7000 series. ATI released the successor to the R500 series with the R600 series on May 14, 2007. ATI does not provide official support for any X1000 series cards for Windows 7The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body