Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA 3000 Radeon HD 4250
Red Dead Redemption 2 6759% 4512%
Cyberpunk 2077 9323% 6236%
Doom Eternal 5797% 3866%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6759% 4512%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4131% 2745%
Halo: Reach 2079% 1366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 9323% 6236%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 9323% 6236%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10381% 6947%
Need For Speed Heat 6759% 4512%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4250 are significantly better than the Intel GMA 3000.

The GMA 3000 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over three years more recently than the GMA 3000, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GMA 3000 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 512 MB video memory, but the GMA 3000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GMA 3000 has 8 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 4250 has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the GMA 3000 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15. The Radeon HD 4250 having 15 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GMA 3000 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs560 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-RS880
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jul 2006vs30 Mar 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed400 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs32 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth6.4GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units8vs40
Actual Shader Performance-vs1%
Technology-vs55nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs4
Texture Rate-vs2.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs4
Pixel Rate-vs2.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs10.1
Shader Model3.0vs4.1
Open GL-vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel GMA 3000 is an integrated GPU that might come with some of Intel's old chipsets. Its performance, as well as its specifications will depend from chipset to chipset.Radeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body