Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel GMA 3000 Riva TNT2 Pro
Halo: Reach 2079% 8618%
Cyberpunk 2077 9323% 37592%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6759% 27336%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4131% 16823%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6759% 27336%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 9323% 37592%
Doom Eternal 5797% 23490%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10381% 41823%
FIFA 20 3554% 14515%
Need For Speed Heat 6759% 27336%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GMA 3000 are massively better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The GMA 3000 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GMA 3000 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the GMA 3000 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 32 MB video memory, but the GMA 3000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GMA 3000 has 8 Shader Processing Units and the Riva TNT2 Pro has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV5
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jul 2006vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs32 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth6.4GB/secvs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units8vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs6.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL-vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel GMA 3000 is an integrated GPU that might come with some of Intel's old chipsets. Its performance, as well as its specifications will depend from chipset to chipset.The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body